Monday, July 28, 2025

William and Fannie Knauss McWilliams - Chapter 1

William McWilliams and Fannie Knauss were my maternal great-great-grandparents. William was the son and grandson of John and William McWilliams whose family histories are also posted here. William and Fannie spent most of their lives in Northumberland County, Pennsylvania, but traveled west a few times. Their oldest son, Benjamin, wrote a memoir in his eighties and left behind many stories about his family and his imprisonment in Confederate prison camps, including Andersonville, during the Civil War. 

(Note - Click on the photos to open them in a new larger window.)



William and Fannie McWilliams' Headstone in Barton City Cemetery 
Barton County, Missouri

WESTWARD HO!

In the spring of 1852, William and Fannie McWilliams loaded a horse-drawn wagon with all their worldly goods and joined tens of thousands of other pioneers heading westward to Iowa. It was highly unlikely that either of them had been more than a few miles from their birthplace in Pennsylvania when they began their trek toward the prairies of the Midwest. Their destination was Dubuque, located on the Mississippi River in northeast Iowa at the juncture of three states; Iowa, Wisconsin and Illinois. The lure of cheap, fertile farmland tempted them to venture forth halfway across the continent from their Northumberland County, Pennsylvania, home with their four young children. The trip would be long, difficult and dangerous for Ben aged 8½, John 4½, Francis Marion 2½, and James, only four months old. 



Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania’s Golden Triangle in 1850

Their wagon carried them over land for the first 200 miles to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where they continued their journey by river.  Entering the huge, bustling Ohio River port was likely a bewildering experience for them as they boarded a steamboat bound for Dubuque. Over 46,000 people lived in the city, and steamboat trade and travel on the river was at its peak.  Pittsburgh was located at the magnificent source of the Ohio River, formed by the confluence of the Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers, known as the Golden Triangle.  They probably left the harbor as the rising sun erased the usual light, morning fog enveloping the river.



Morning Fog Over the Ohio River on the Pennsylvania and Ohio Border on July 19, 2018


The McWilliams family traveled a distance of 981 miles westward down the broad, blue waters of the Ohio River to reach the Mississippi River at Cairo, Illinois. There the Ohio River was wider than the Mississippi and its clear water gradually mingled with the muddy-brown color of the Mississippi. They turned upstream and traveled an additional 581 miles to reach Dubuque around June 15.  Their steamboat floated past the cities of Cincinnati, Louisville, St. Louis, and scores of smaller towns on the riverbanks of nine states. The trip must have been an epic experience for the family!



Ohio River at Cincinnati in 1848

There is no record of how long it took their vessel to travel from Pittsburgh to Dubuque. Steamboats typically averaged a speed of about five miles per hour and might cover twenty-five to fifty miles in a day. Factors such as weather, the craft’s size, cargo weight, river current and depth affected its rate of speed. The frequency of stops for passengers and fuel (coal or wood) added unpredictable amounts of time to the journey.



St. Louis Levee 1852

It was likely the McWilliams traveled “economy class” as deck passengers. Wealthy patrons’ more expensive cabin fares provided a berth and meals, but deck passengers paid one-sixth to one-quarter cent per mile and made their own beds on the lower cargo deck of the boat. These accommodations offered little protection from the elements. Deck passengers usually brought their own food on board and could cook on community stoves available for passengers’ use. They slept in their clothes and used toilet facilities which emptied into the river. Both rich and poor steamboat travelers faced potential danger and disaster as they floated to their destination.



Steamboat Deck Passengers 

“Deck passengers usually outnumbered cabin passengers three or four to one. The fares were cheap but the comforts few: without beds or shelter, they found room among the cargo crates. Diseases spread in such close quarters. The deck passengers in this image are suffering from cholera.”

From John M. Woodworth, The Cholera Epidemic of 1873 in the United States, 1875. - Courtesy of Smithsonian Institution Libraries



Louisville, Kentucky Wharf

Boiler explosions, grounding on sand bars, collisions with floating tree trunks or other debris, thieves on board, and epidemics of diseases such as cholera were common on the crowded waterways. 



Keokuk, Iowa Landing 1853


At long last the weary family reached their destination when the boat docked in Dubuque, Iowa. Their first impression may have been similar to this 1849 account by another traveler.

“Creeping into the crooked harbor of Dubuque like a burster going late to bed. Sun-rise. Dubuque is washing her face for Sunday. She is a fair town, and in our opinion will never be less. The buildings are generally brick, the streets are regular and dry. Dubuque, we must say, looks slightly slack about the feet and ancles [sic]. There is about many of the houses a margin of “clutter” where all should be clear. One street, well built for a new town, extends, apparently, three-fourths of a mile, leaving room for an extension on the same level beyond. We saw no hogs about town. The houses are underpinned, so we infer, the hogs are kept for service and not for society."



Map of the Ohio and Mississippi River route traveled by the McWilliams family in 1852



ABOUT-FACE

Apparently, something went awry almost as soon as they arrived in Dubuque. After completing the perilous voyage to Iowa, the McWilliams stayed there for only two weeks before they again loaded their wagon to return to Pennsylvania! For some unknown reason they reversed their decision to relocate on the Midwest prairie.  

Perhaps William was discouraged from settling in the area simply because it was so crowded and expensive, with too many other folks seeking to relocate there at the same time. Dubuque grew very rapidly in 1852; thousands of homeseekers and capitalists landed from the steamers.  The city had a population of over 5000 in February 1852 and one hundred new buildings were erected in the town during that year. 414 boats arrived in the Dubuque harbor in 1852 and 351 docked the year before. The boats not only carried passengers and cargo, but also a dreaded outbreak of cholera in the summer of 1852. Other factors which may have contributed to the family’s quick departure were described in the town’s newspaper, “Daily Miners’ Express.”

“Why is it that property has advanced some 30 or 50 per cent in the last year in this city and that so many married men are flocking to the place anxious to invest their means among us? (May 20, 1852) Never did a spring open in Dubuque with more flattering prospects of a healthy and lucrative trade. Our hotels are crowded beyond their capacity to accommodate; our merchants, builders and mechanics are active; our smelting mills and foundries, etc., are enjoying a season of the highest prosperity; our streets are crowded with immigrant wagons; the demand for dwellings and business houses is beyond the capacity of our property holders to meet; the best and fastest steam ferry boat on the Mississippi is actively engaged; the harbor improvement is progressing rapidly; and everywhere is seen growth and prosperity.” (April 9, 1852) 

The family may have suddenly been overwhelmed by their lack of financial resources and manpower, as they faced the reality of life on an isolated homestead. William’s father died in 1849 and his estate was settled in 1852, so perhaps he hoped to use inherited money to purchase land in Iowa. Life was primitive on the recently opened territory in the Midwest, however, and he may have had second thoughts upon arrival. Establishing a home on the available land required building a shelter and breaking the prairie soil to plant crops. They may have brought little food or equipment with them and supplies were scarce in the remote areas where families were settling. The tasks may have been too daunting for 31-year-old William without the support of his extended family, especially in a region with vastly different resources from the mountains and valleys of Pennsylvania. 

It is likely that William spent most of his inheritance and savings on his ill-fated trip west. He was paid $77.83 for services rendered to his father and $1184.31 as an heir in the account of administrators in his father’s probate file documents.  The journey to Iowa and back probably depleted those funds. There is no record of him owning land during the remainder of his lifetime.

The McWilliams’ journey back to Northumberland County was a leisurely trip including stops to visit with relatives. They traveled overland about one hundred miles and stayed three days in Dixon, Illinois, with friends who had moved west the year before. From there they boarded a train bound for Detroit, by way of Chicago. After the four-hundred-mile trip to Detroit, they once again boarded a boat, which crossed Lake Erie and docked in Sandusky, Ohio. Back on land, they travelled about fifteen miles to the home of Fannie’s uncle, Solomon Knauss.  

Solomon owned a large farm two miles north of Bellevue, Ohio, where they stayed for nine weeks before covering the last four hundred miles to their old home by wagon. It was probably late summer by the time the McWilliams arrived in Bellevue.  Perhaps William decided to help Solomon with his farm chores and harvest before returning to Pennsylvania. In 1850, Solomon and his elder sons had raised 1400 bushels of wheat, 1200 bushels of Indian corn, 500 bushels of oats, 200 bushels of potatoes, 24 bushels of clover seed, and 56 tons of hay. He owned eight horses, seven milch cows, ten other cattle, thirty-three sheep and forty swine. Their sheep yielded 50 pounds of wool and the women of the household churned 626 pounds of butter.  There was surely plenty of work to occupy both families. 


Sandusky Docks on Lake Erie 1854




The McWilliams may have taken the Chicago and Fulton Railroad and the Michigan Central Railroad, shown on this 1855 map, on their return trip to Pennsylvania.  The route from Dubuque to Sandusky is marked by dots and shading on the map. Their path down the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers is also traced. 

The family faced many challenges in the years following their return to Pennsylvania. Sickness, the Civil War and dreary work in coal mines would challenge the McWilliams family's future destiny.  


Sources: 
  McWilliams, Benjamin Cruiser, B.C. McWilliams Prison Diary, Copied from the original by Georgia Mathews Wood and Walter H. Wood, Son of Lena Query Wood, Granddaughter of B.C. McWilliams, Distributed at the Annual Reunion at the Buck Run Community Center, Ft. Scott, Bourbon County, Kansas, August 1995, War History, page 1; accessed copy owned by Cynthia L. Cruz

  Image from Brookline PA website, Brookline Connection, Historical Facts and Photos, Brookline and Pittsburgh – The First 260 Years and Counting (1754 – present), Pittsburg History, The Golden Triangle, The Point – 1850, no documentation of image;  www.brooklineconnection.com/history/Facts/Point1850.html

  Ripley, George and Dana Charles A., The New American Cyclopaedia: A Popular Dictionary of General Knowledge, volume 13, New York, D. Appleton and Company, 1879, page 554; accessed https://archive.org 

  Cruz, Cynthia, personal photograph, Ohio River at Wheeling, West Virginia/Ohio state line, July 19, 2018

  Ohio and Mississippi River Maps; accessed https://www.riverlorian.com/rivermaps.htm  

  Fontayne, Charles and Porter, William, Daguerreotype View of Cincinnati, Taken from Newport, KY, September 24, 1848, housed in the Public Library of Cincinnati and Hamilton County; https://1848.cincinnatilibrary.org/;
accessed https://www.wired.com/2010/07/ff_daguerrotype_panorama/2/
 
  Easterly, Thomas, Daguerreotype, St. Louis Levee, 1852, St. Louis MO; accessed stlouis_levee1852thomas_easterly1600x1224; accessed https://steamboattimes.com/levee_scenes.html

  Explorations in Iowa History Project, Frontier Life in Iowa (1833-1870), Transportation in Frontier Iowa, Helpful Hints for Steamboat Passengers, PDF, accessed https://iowahist.uni.ed 

  Billings, John S., Woodworth, John M., The Cholera Epidemic of 1873 in the United States, 1875, Washington D.C., Government Printing Office, 1875, page 52A, Smithsonian Institution Libraries; accessed https://archive.org

  Tim Talbott, “Louisville’s Steamboat Era,” ExploreKYHistory; accessed https://explorekyhistory.ky.gov/items/show/461

  Easterly, Thomas, Daguerreotype, Keokuk Landing, Iowa, 1852, Keokuk, Iowa; keokuk_landing1853thomas_easterly1600x1002; accessed https://steamboattimes.com/levee_scenes.html 

  Babcock, Willoughby M., Steamboat Travel on the Upper Mississippi in 1849, Minnesota History Magazine, Volume 7, Issue 1, March 1926, page 57-58, Minnesota Historical Society; accessed collections.mnhs.org/MNHistoryMagazine/articles/7/v07i01p054-061.pdf  

  Map of Ohio and Mississippi Rivers; accessed www.captainjohn.org/River_MissUP.html

  Oldt, Franklin T. and Quigley, P.J., History of Dubuque County Iowa; being a general survey of Dubuque County history, including a history of the city of Dubuque and special accounts of districts throughout the county, from the earliest settlement to the present time, Chicago, Goodspeed Historical Association, 1911, page 211, Library of Congress; accessed https://archive.org

 Oldt, page 94-95

  Northumberland County, Pennsylvania, Orphan’s Court Docket, Administrators Accounts, Volume 1, p. 184-185, John McWilliams (1852), Account, 3 August 1852, Register and Recorder’s Office, Northumberland County Courthouse, Sunbury

  McWilliams, page 1

  King, Wilbur Lewis, Knauss Genealogy, Lukas Knauss (1633-1713), of Dudelsheim, Germany and his American Descendants, Bethlehem, PA, Privately Printed, 1930, page 68-69; accessed https://archive.org  

  1850 U.S. Census, Erie County, Ohio, Groton Township, Agriculture Schedule, page 101B, William McWilliams; NARA microfilm publication T1159, Roll 3, line 27; U.S., Selected Federal Census Non-Population Schedules, 1850-1880; accessed www.ancestry.com, image 1

  Sachse, E. and Company, View of the City of Sandusky, O, Baltimore, Maryland, 1854, Sandusky Library Archives Research Center; Ohio History Connection, Ohio Memory Collection; accessed https://ohiomemory.org  

  Bradford, L.H. & Co., Railway Map Shewing the Connections Between Muscatine, Iowa and Eastern Cities, Boston, 1857; Railroad Maps, 1828 to 1900, Library of Congress; accessed https://www.loc.gov


Next Time - THE FIRSTBORN SON 


Tuesday, April 23, 2024

JOHANN MICHAEL AND ANNA MARGARETHA GRÄTER LIEB - Chapter Six

 

Introduction 

My fifth great-grandparents Johann Michael and Anna Margaretha Gräter Lieb represent the earliest documented ancestors of my great-grandmother, Catherine Ellen Lieb McWilliams. The Liebs emigrated from present-day Germany to America. Written records of the Gräter family and Anna Margaretha's second husband, Johann Mathias Staudt's family, date back into the 1600s in church books in the Sulzdorf, Württemberg and Wolfersweiler, Saarland states in the Holy Roman Empire. The Lieb's arrived in Philadelphia on Saturday, August 11, 1750. The rest is history! 



 The Staudt Property was Adjacent to this Farm


MORE ABOUT MATHIAS 

A few details about Mathias’ mill business and his gradual accumulation of wealth were gleaned from Bern and Heidelberg Township tax records dating from the second half of the eighteenth century. Different portions of his land and property were taxed at various times depending upon the amount of money the King, province, state or county demanded to finance specific projects.

His name first appeared in the 1758 Berks County Provincial list of taxpayers in Bern Township, followed by more than twenty-five other tax records over his lifetime. Provincial taxes were laid on the heads of households to fund the Penn family’s management of the province, to provide a “sinking fund” for the use of King George II of England, and “for defraying the charge of killing and destroying wolves, foxes and crows with such other uses as may redound to the Public Benefit and services of the said County.” The third tax supplied funds to pay bounties to citizens who provided proof that they killed canine animals which were a threat to livestock or crows which damaged farm crops.

Mathias Staut 1768 Tax Bern Township, Berks County, Pennsylvania

Surviving tax documents listed Mathias’ real estate, mills, livestock and other property which was assessed at various rates by different authorities according to their needs. Mathias was charged 8 shillings as a farmer owning 2 horses, 2 cattle and 100 acres of land on the Proprietary Tax Return in Bern Township in 1767. Another tax list the following year uncovered more details about his farm. He was levied £5 on 50 acres of woodland, 10 acres of cleared land, 4 acres of “sowed” [land under cultivation], 2 horses and 2 cattle. (See 1768 tax roll above)





Mathew Stoudt 1779 Bern Township, Berks County, Supply Tax List



The 1779 Pennsylvania Board of Comptrollers Supply Tax levied in Berks County revealed that Mathias had prospered and expanded his mill business. He was assessed on two different kinds of mills; a gristmill and hemp mill. This was the first year that mills were included in the tax assessment figures. Mathias acquired Michael Lieb’s gristmill upon his marriage to Anna Margaretha, but he must have erected the hemp mill sometime between 1755 and 1779. Hemp was a major cash crop in colonial Pennsylvania. The gristmill was used to grind grain into meal or flour, while the hemp mill broke down hemp stalks as part of the process to prepare the hemp fiber for use in ropes, ship sails, grain bags, rugs, and hemp linen for clothing. The supply tax was indicative of the change in American government. Unlike the previous taxes which funded the British king’s interests, this tax was levied to help pay debts Pennsylvania incurred during the Revolutionary War. The price was heavy; Mathias was charged £41 pounds on his £811 valuation.


Hemp Millstone

Pennsylvania hemp mills made use of large conical shaped millstones that rolled over top of the hemp fiber as part of the process of preparing the fiber for use in homespun fabrics.






Mathew Stoud 1783 Bern Township, Berks County, Pennsylvania

The 1783 Berks County Tax and Exoneration list disclosed a few more pieces of information about the Staudt’s family and property. The valuation included nearly the same items as listed in previous years, but this document stated that Mathias had a house and barn on his land and there were three persons in his household. He was charged 6 pounds, 2 shillings, 11 pence. 




Mathias Stoudt 1786 Bern Township, Berks County, Pennsylvania, in German

Several tax lists were recorded in German, rather than English. This was a direct reflection on the population in Bern Township, which was home to a large number of immigrants from the Palatine region of Germany. The Germans banded together in their community and maintained their cherished language and customs. This 1786 tax roll was recorded in both languages in different copies of Berks County tax books. 





Mathew Stoudt 1788 Bern Township, Berks County, Pennsylvania


Three years later, a sawmill was added to Mathias’ county property assessment. In 1788, he was charged 1 pound, 12 shillings, 4 pence on 30 acres of land, 1 Gristmill, 1 Sawmill, 1 Hempmill, 2 Horses and 2 Cows. His sawmill was likely a wise investment as the county population grew and settlers began to replace log cabins with wood frame houses and barns.  Through the years, his property was consistently valued at a level slightly below the wealthiest inhabitants of Bern Township. Even though he did not own a large amount of real estate, his mills obviously provided a comfortable income for his family. 



John, Mathias Jr. & Abraham Staudt

1798 US Direct Tax List, Bern Township, Berks County, Pennsylvania



The first direct tax levied by the United States government was initiated in 1798 and it recorded another bit of information about Mathias and Anna Margaretha’s property. The direct tax was created to fund expansion of the US Military in preparation for a possible war with France. Each of the country’s sixteen states was entrusted with assessing houses valued at more than $100, assigning a tax rate and collecting the taxes owed. Since many of the homes had expensive glass windows, the direct tax is sometimes called the “glass” or “window” tax. Even though both Mathias and Anna Margaretha had passed away by this time, their sons John and Mathias Jr. inhabited the homes they inherited from their parents. The value of their dwellings provided another bit of insight into the Staudt’s economic situation. John lived in his parent’s home which was valued at $600 and Mathias Jr. lived in a dwelling on a second Staudt property valued at $250. They paid $1.80 and $.50 in taxes, respectively.  Abraham Staudt, listed below their names, was the third Staudt brother. He owned land and a house valued at $200, near his sibling’s property. This document was also the first Staudt tax record to use dollars and cents, rather than pounds, shillings and pence, to express the value of property and the amount of tax collected.




1761 Naturalization Record for Mathias Staudt


Mathias took advantage of the opportunity to become a naturalized British citizen in 1761. The British government passed an act in 1740 which allowed any foreigner who had lived in a British territory for seven years to obtain the same rights as natural born Englishmen. The procedure to receive the new status was simply to appear before a chief judge of the colony, take an oath of allegiance (or an affirmation, for those professing the Quaker other dissenting faiths) to the British Crown, and take the Lord’s Supper (Communion) within three months of their court appearance. Naturalization granted all the full legal rights and privileges of a native-born citizen to a non-native foreigner. 



Excerpt from History of Berks County by Morton Montgomery

Mathias was baptized in the Reformed Church in Wolfersweiler and was an active member of the Reformed congregation in Bern Church. He was mentioned as a trustee of Bern Church in 1762 in Montgomery’s History of Berks County. He served as a trustee with my 5th great-grandfather, Jost [Yost] Hiester, when additional acreage was added to the church property and construction of the second church building was authorized. The Staudt children were probably baptized in Bern Church, but written records from the era of their births were not kept or have not survived. It was recorded that there was a great shortage of Reformed ministers in Pennsylvania in the 1700s.   



B
erks List of the Petit Jury of a Court of Oyer and Terminer
Held May 13, 1776

Mathias’ name was found in a list of petit trial jurors for a session of a Court of Oyer and Terminer, a court of criminal jurisdiction, in Pennsylvania. Twelve men were chosen by lot for each case from the current jury list at the beginning of each court session. The petit jury returned a verdict in criminal cases. This was evidence that Mathias may have served on a jury just two months before the official creation of the United States of America.    



Mathw Staudt in the 1790 US Federal Census
Bern Township, Berks County, Pennsylvania

The Staudt family was enumerated in the first United States Federal Population Census taken in 1790. Mathias and three other “free white males sixteen years and upward” were marked in the left column and Anna Margaretha and two other “free white females” were counted in the right column. Mathias and Anna Margaretha’s three sons were 32, 33 and 34 years old and the two daughters were 18 and 28, but no names except the head of household were collected by the census taker. All the Staudt children may have still lived at home, but it was more likely that only some of them and their spouses may have lived with Mathias. John may have lived in the home because he inherited his parent’s dwelling in 1795.

Mathias was also enumerated in Bern Township, Berks County, in the first three Pennsylvania Septennial Censuses taken in 1779, 1786 and 1793. These censuses were repeated every seven years for tax purposes and to determine representation in state government. However, they only proved residence of the head of household and provided no other information about any members of the family.


THE STAUDT LEGACY



Mathias Staudt Headstone in Bern Churchyard

Mathias passed away at age 69 on 22 May 1795 in Bern Township. Anna Margaretha died two years later, at age 68, on 27 May 1797. They were buried side by side in row “Q” in plots 15 and 16 in Bern Churchyard near Leesport in Berks County. The inscriptions on their original headstones have faded, but the words were preserved in Bern’s Forebears, A Guide to Its Graveyard. A new monument for the couple was placed in front of Mathias’ weathered marker.

 


Anna Margaretha “Chräder” Staudt Headstone in Bern Churchyard

The entries for Anna Margaretha and Mathias in Bern’s Forebears contain the German epitaphs on the original tombstones and their English translations. Genealogist, James M. Beidler provided his theory on how the “Chr(a)der” [Chräder] variation from Anna Margaretha’s maiden name “Gräter” may have occurred. The initial “Ch” in German was often pronounced like an English “K,” which, in turn, might have been mistaken for a hard “G” sound. The “d” and “t” consonant sounds could have been likewise confused. Finally, the letter “n” was added to German surnames to indicate the feminine form. Therefore, “Chrädern” was a reasonable variant of “Gräter.”

Mathias wrote his last will and testament on 7 April 1795 and it was proven in the Register’s Office in Reading on 22 July of the same year. His will provided for Anna Margaretha and specified how his estate should be divided among his children. Sons, Abraham and Mathias Jr., were named as his executors. 

Anna Margaretha and Mathias’ sons continued the mill and farming businesses and were successful, respected members of Bern (later Penn) and North Heidelberg Townships. Their descendants remained in Berks County where they were especially prominent in the Bern Reformed and St. John’s Hain’s Reformed Church communities.

Mathias and Anna Margaretha’s oldest son, John, inherited the original Lieb mill property. The subsequent chain of ownership can be traced to the 1975 sale to the US Government by power of imminent domain for the Blue Marsh National Recreation Area lake and flood control project. A small portion of the property on the banks of Tulpehocken Creek was also sold to the Union Canal Company of Pennsylvania in 1830. 

Mathias and Anna Margaretha’s youngest son, Johann Mathias, inherited the other 135 acres of land owned by his father. Mathias died at age thirty and his oldest brother, John, became the owner of all the land Mathias and Anna Margaretha owned. Their middle son, Abraham, purchased the land on which the "Upper Staudt Mill" would eventually be built.

More recent generations of the Staudt family lived across Tulpehocken Creek in Lower Heidelberg Township near the village of Brownsville. Samuel Staudt and his son Henry Leiss Staudt each owned farms in the area.  Mathias and Anna Margaretha’s fourth great-grandson, Kermit Staudt, was the last of three generations to own Henry’s property until the mid-1970s.

Most of the Staudt properties were purchased by the US Government to become part of the Blue Marsh Recreational Area. Henry’s former property in Lower Heidelberg was spared the bulldozer, however, and is now preserved by an historical non-profit organization and is part of living history site known as Old Dry Road Farm. The Staudt farmhouse, barn, outbuildings and a 1776 spring house remain on the farm. Other structures from the Essig and Dundore farms are also preserved on the site. 



 
Painting of Old Dry Road Farm
The Staudt Farm is at the Upper Right of the Painting. 
 
 


Friday, March 01, 2024

JOHANN MICHAEL AND ANNA MARGARETHA GRÄTER LIEB - Chapter Five

 

Introduction 

My fifth great-grandparents Johann Michael and Anna Margaretha Gräter Lieb represent the earliest documented ancestors of my great-grandmother, Catherine Ellen Lieb McWilliams. The Liebs emigrated from present-day Germany to America. Written records of the Gräter family and Anna Margaretha's second husband, Johann Mathias Staudt's family, date back into the 1600s in church books in the Sulzdorf, Württemberg and Wolfersweiler, Saarland states in the Holy Roman Empire. The Lieb's arrived in Philadelphia on Saturday, August 11, 1750. The rest is history! 


Door Panels from the Original Bern Reformed Church Near the Lieb/Staudt Home
Photo taken in Berks History Center, Reading, PA by Cindy Cruz 


A SECOND CHANCE – 

JOHANN MATHIAS AND ANNA MARGARETHA GRÄTER LIEB STAUDT

Twenty-six-year-old Anna Margaretha was left in a difficult situation when Michael died in the prime of life and she was left to raise four children as a single parent. Their income was probably generated by Michael’s mill and it would have been nearly impossible for her to manage a grist mill while caring for her young children. She likely had no experience running the business they purchased less than two years earlier. To further complicate matters, most German women had no formal education and spoke little or no English. Navigating a business world dominated by men in a community that was likely still “foreign” to her would have added another serious hurdle to maintain her precarious financial position. It was possible, or even likely, that a trusted relative or male friend was appointed to oversee her business.

Fate smiled on the unfortunate widow as she faced a lonely and uncertain future. Anna Margaretha and Johann Mathias Staudt, a thirty-year-old, single German immigrant, were married soon after Michael’s death. They may have fallen in love or perhaps were attracted to each other because of the mutual benefits their marriage provided to them. Mathias acquired a domestic partner and grist mill business and Anna Margaretha gained the financial support and protection of a husband. He must have been a kind man to take on the heavy responsibility of supporting a new wife and four young children.

Mathias was born in the Gimbweiler, Oldenburg, (later Germany), area and was baptized in the Reformed church in Wolfersweiler on 26 December 1725. He was the son of Abraham Staudt, who immigrated to Pennsylvania on 3 September 1739 on the ship Loyal Judith, and Anna Catharina Geiss Staudt who died in 1734 before the family emigrated. He, his father, brothers, sister, and brother-in-law came to America together when Mathias was fourteen years old. Family lore suggested he spent his teen years in Bern (later Centre) Township living in the household of his older sister Lisa Margarete and her husband Johann Nicholas Klee.




26 December 1725 Baptism Record for Johann Mathias Staudt

Translation:

Joh[ann] Matteis. legitimate son of Abraham Staudt from Gimbw[eiler] And Anna Catharina his legitimate wife was baptized on 26 xbr [December] Bernahard Göltzer; Joh[ann] Matteis, son of Hans Adam Wommer; Rosina Magdalena, daughter of Johann Gusen [Geiss]. (The last three names were probably Mathias’ baptism sponsors.)

Mathias and Anna Margaretha prospered together and added more children and more mills to their realm. Three sons, John, Abraham, and Mathias and two daughters, Anna Elizabeth and Catherine Maria, were born to the couple. Mathias built an additional hemp mill and sawmill on the 36 acres of the original Lieb property. He also expanded his land ownership with the purchase of another 136-acre property which straddled Tulpehocken Creek

When Michael Lieb’s children reached the age of majority, Anna Margaretha and Mathias fulfilled her obligation to them as specified in Michael’s will. They divided the proceeds from the sale of his personal property and the money she was required to pay the estate in exchange for ownership of Michael’s real estate. Three of Michael’s four children signed a deed on 23 February 1773 acknowledging their receipt of their inheritance and their release of any claim to their father’s real estate. Nicholas Lieb, Simon Lieb and Anna Catharina Lieb Pfaffenberger and her husband Michael signed the deed. The fourth heir, Maria Margaretha Lieb did not sign until 1783 because she was described as “still under the age of twenty-one years.” As a result, Anna Margaretha and her second husband Mathias Staudt became the legal sole owners of the Lieb homestead. 



Michael Lieb Heir’s 1773 Deed to Mathias & Anna Margaretha Staudt


THE STAUDT “MANSION HOUSE”

The Staudts were blessed with forty years of marriage before Mathias passed away in 1795. He enjoyed a long life and died just a few months shy of his 70th birthday. His estate file included an inventory of his personal possessions which provided rich details about the furnishings, linens, and kitchen equipment owned by Mathias and Anna Margaretha. It also listed the livestock and farm tools Mathias used in his everyday chores. The diverse, long list of possessions suggested that the couple received ample income from their farm, gristmill, sawmill and hemp mill. 

Mathias’ will spelled out specific provisions to be furnished to Anna Margaretha every year after his death. The list of firewood, livestock, grain, and other foods gave keen insight into her diet and how her meals were prepared.

“I Give and Bequeath unto my Beloved wife Anna Margaret During her Natural Life the following Enumerated Articles Yearly and every Year, that is to Say Twelve Bushel of Good Merchantable wheat the same to be Ground and Baked for her as She wants and Orders the same, One hog in the fall weighing at Least One hundred and fifty pounds and fifty pound of Beaf, One Barrel of Cider when Apples Apples [sic] fetcht to her as Much as She wants, Veigetbles of all kinds as Much as She wants for her Use, Eggs as Much as She wants, and to have the rights of killing A fowl when She pleases, One Cow to be kept for her use She my said wife to have Always her Choice of the Cows at any time on the Premises I now live, free wood haul’d and Small Cut, and fetcht in the house fit for fire use, which said Articles Shall be Raised out of my Estate and to be Delivered unto my Beloved wife Aforesaid by my Son John Stout, And I also Give and bequeath unto my Beloved wife Anna Margaret the Room I now live in with free Liberty to the kitchen Together with as Much of my household furniture as She wants or hath Need of, One Bushel of Coarse and half Bushel of fine Salt Yearly to be delivered by my Son John, unto my wife Aforesaid, I also Give unto my wife Aforesaid the Sum of Ten pounds, (Yearly) in Gold and Silver Money of Pennsylvania* And to Nurse her in Sickness and Old Age."

These instructions suggested that the Staudts were accustomed to a balanced diet and plenty of food. Pork, beef, poultry and eggs supplied protein, while bread, vegetables, apples, milk products and cider rounded out their meals. Fine-grain salt was used for seasoning foods and coarse-grain salt was needed for preserving foods. Firewood was used as fuel for both cooking and heating.

*A pound “in gold and silver money of Pennsylvania” in 1750 was worth about $260 in today’s money.



Excerpt from Mathias Staudt's Estate Inventory 

 

WOMAN’S WORK

Additional details about Anna Margaretha’s everyday life were discovered in the list of personal property she elected to retain from Mathias’ estate inventory. The fate of the remainder of his goods was not specified in his will. Property was typically sold at auction, or it may have been divided among their children. Her “flour box, dough trough, and scraper” were evidence that she baked her own bread. She may have also prepared an occasional sweet dessert using her “cake funnel.” An unspecified quantity of “dryed apples” hinted that Mathias may have had an apple orchard and she preserved their fruit by drying it. She probably also preserved cabbage by making sauerkraut because she kept their “cabbage cutter.” Coffee and tea must have been available and enjoyed as a hot beverage because she retained her “copper tea kettle” and “coffee roaster.” A “salt box” and “pepper mill” suggested that Anna Margaretha liked her food seasoned well.

Out of necessity, Anna Margaretha retained her ten-plate stove with pipe, shovel and tongs for heating and cooking her meals. Valued at £5/5/0, it was one of the most expensive items in her home. She kept her pot rack and a few cooking utensils including two iron pots and lids, a frying pan, two iron skillets, a “tin quart,” a “skimmer, two ladles and a flesh [meat] fork.” Earthen ware, six pewter plates and spoons, three knives and forks, and four table cloths were saved for setting her table. Her kitchenware was probably stored in the “kitchen dresser” she elected to keep. She also held back several articles for storage including a crate, a bucket, two “Indian baskets,” a barrel, a keg, a tub, and eighteen earthen pots. 

Anna Margaretha could have enjoyed needlework, or it may have been a necessary chore to clothe herself and her family. Along with her kitchen items, she kept a spinning wheel, “spun yarn,” twelve yards of linen, “flaxen and tow linen,” sewing thread and “bucking cloth.” The linen was quite valuable as it was appraised at £10/9/0.

Essential furnishings, linens, and a couple of “luxury” items rounded out the few possessions Anna Margaretha retained for her personal use. Of course, she kept her bedstead, bed [mattress], five sheets and “bed cases,” two pillow cases, a blanket, curtains, and one additional bed, all appraised at £5. She also kept a chest for storage. Other necessary possessions included an arm chair, two other chairs, a lamp, her brass water bowl, soap and tallow, and six towels. A thirty-hour clock, valued at £5/15/0, and “some books” were the only non-essential items that she kept for herself.

Anna Margaretha did not claim a large portion of her and Mathias’ belongings listed in the inventory. The dwelling she lived in was willed to her son John. It must have been spacious to house all the Staudt’s furniture and other possessions. They owned walnut tables, 4 benches, 3 chairs, 4 chests, 3 bedsteads, and a cloth press [wardrobe chest.] Two lamps, two iron candle sticks, two pewter candle sticks and a snuffer provided lighting for the home. A box, earthen ware, a straw basket, other “trumpery” [decorative items] and window glass (see the 1798 tax on page 73) provided storage and decorated the living space. 

A number of bed linens including four bed sheets, a bed case, a bolster case and some old bedding were cataloged in the house. At least two tablecloths and three towels were also listed. Even a dressed deer skin was among the items in the household.

Anna Margaretha’s kitchen was especially well stocked with cooking implements. Several pewter utensils including 11 plates, a basin, 2 dishes and 18 spoons were stored in the kitchen. Equipment for special purposes, such as a chopping board, bread baskets, coffee pot, tea ware, earthen pitcher, tin colander, grater, buckwheat griddle, dripping pan, patty pan, and an earthen fish plate, pitcher and pots also stood ready for use. A wooden tray, ladle, bottles, glasses, and bowls could have been used for serving family or company. The usual frying pan, skillet, iron pots, Dutch oven, copper kettle, lids and pot hooks were available for cooking almost any traditional Pennsylvania Dutch dish.

A butter churn and 3 butter tubs were evidence that Anna Margaretha probably churned her own butter. A cheese tub and sauerkraut tub hinted at two other foods that the family produced and consumed. A “cook’s tormentor” [long meat fork], some type of sausage-making implement, a grind stone, and a washing tub all served useful purposes for the lady of the house. There were also several containers that could be used to carry or store kitchen produce, including earthen jugs, 2 casks, a tub, 2 baskets, 5 buckets and some bags.

A few representative examples of food in the Staudt’s household were included in the estate inventory. Bacon, ham, dried apples, hog’s lard and butter were listed. Another salt box filled with salt and an earthen jug of lime were also included. Two fish nets were evidence that the family may have eaten fish taken from Tulpehocken Creek which ran through the Staudt property. A 32-gallon cask of whiskey topped off the contents of the kitchen!

Even though Anna Margaretha held back several needlework supplies, there were many more in the full inventory. There were 2 spinning wheels, a cotton wheel, a woolen wheel, 2 pair of wool cards, a pair of cotton cards, and 2 hatchels for use in preparing fibers for cloth. A large amount of fabric on hand included 48 ¾ yards flaxen linen, 11 yards of tow linen, 2 ½ yards stripes, 3 ¾ yards check, linen stripe, yarn and spun tow yarn. Some leather and cloth remnants concluded the listing of needlework supplies.



Excerpt from Mathias Staudt's Estate Inventory


THE MAN OF THE HOUSE

Mathias’ personal effects disclosed a few details about his life that might have remained hidden without their written description in the inventory. The value of his wearing apparel was fairly high in comparison to his other possessions. His wardrobe was appraised at £8/14/6 [8 pounds, 14 shilling, 6 pence]. Only his stallion [£30], mare [£20], whiskey [£10] and fine linen fabric [£10] were worth more than his clothing. Either he had a large number of clothes or they were made of high-quality materials. 

Mathias might have been clean shaven, or regularly trimmed his beard, because he owned 2 razors and a tin shaving dish. Perhaps he enjoyed reading because his library was valued at £3/10/0, although no specific number of books was listed. His gold sealer was probably used to certify his signature on documents and seal his correspondence. A steelyard [balance scale] and set of weights indicated he weighed some type of goods, but the size of the scale was not specified so it is impossible to speculate how it was used. A walnut box may have been used to store his valuables.

Mathias was primarily a miller, but he also raised crops and kept some livestock. His most expensive possessions were his bay stallion and his bay mare. These animals were almost certainly his means of transportation and may have been used as draft animals to pull his farm equipment. He owned several cattle including a brindle [“tiger-striped”] cow and bull, a brown cow, a black heifer, 2 black calves, 4 hogs and 5 shoats [newly weaned pigs.] His will indicated that he also kept fowl of some type on his farm. The eight cattle were appraised at £13/15/0 and the swine were worth £4/17/6.

The horse tack on the Staudt inventory confirmed that horses were used for both transportation and farming. 3 saddles, 2 sleighs, a pair of harness, a girthing strap, 4 pair traces, 2 collars, “hames and quiles,” 2 blind bridles, and a back band were stored in the barn. A wheel barrow, shovels, a dung fork and hooks were evidence of other chores associated with the animals. Lock chains, spancels, cow chains and rope were probably used while milking the cows and doing other barnyard tasks. A cutting box and knives were handy for chopping straw to place in the 2 fodder troughs for the livestock. Various containers stood ready to hold grain or seeds. There was a half bushel, 6 double barrels, 2 single barrels, 5 kegs, buckets, 2 funnels, a cedar tub, tar bucket and bags listed in the inventory. A drawing bench and 4 drawing knives were kept for use when butchering a hog or cow. 

Several varieties of crops were grown on the Staudt plantation. An unspecified quantity of oats, more than five bushels of Indian corn, 7 bushels of wheat, 15½ bushels of rye, 4½ bushels of buckwheat and some flax seed in bags were included in the inventory. Mathias also mentioned in his will that clover seed was to be sown on some pasture land for his livestock.

Simple farm tools and implements were cataloged as well. 2 scythes, 3 sickles, a pitch fork, 3 hay pullers, a winnowing fan, chaff bag, a plow, an iron-feet harrow and harrow chain were listed. The whole family probably worked in the kitchen garden wielding the 2 stone sledges [hammers], pick, 3 hoes, turnip cutter and 2 wooden watering cans found in the appraisement of property.

Like most early settlers in Pennsylvania, Mathias probably built and repaired the wood structures and furniture on his property. A substantial number of woodcutting and woodworking tools were among his possessions. He had 2 axes, 2 hatchets, a crosscut saw, mill saw, saw, planes, a maul, 2 wedges, 3 augers, gimlets, 5 chisels and center bits in his tool collection. Ladders, pinchers, wire nippers and rake maker’s tools completed his list of hand tools.

A conch shell was one of the most curious items in the inventory. The pointed end of a conch shell could be cut off to create a water-and-rust-proof “horn.” These horns were blown as a signal of an approaching watercraft that could be heard a quarter mile away. It may have been used by the Staudts as part of their mill business on Tulpehocken Creek.

A few references to Mathias’ three mills were also found in the inventory. Walnut, oak and maple boards “on the sawmill” and two millstone cases were listed. 31 pounds of raw hemp, probably to be processed for rope fiber in the hemp mill, and “12 barrels of flour in Philadelphia” valued at £40 were included among his assets.

William and Fannie Knauss McWilliams - Chapter 3

  William McWilliams and Fannie Knauss were my maternal great-great-grandparents.  William was the son and grandson of John and William McWi...